Reply to Cordi et al.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In their paper on the influence of the moon on sleep, Cordi et al.[1] have analyzed a large number of subjects and found no significant effects, as opposed to our positive study findings with a smaller cohort [2]. More is not necessarily better. There are two main reasons why we think the comparison of these two data sets is not just comparing a small with a big sample size, since increasing the number of study volunteers in a sleep study does not automatically increase data quality.
منابع مشابه
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
متن کاملEnvironmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)
Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...
متن کاملLetter to editor
Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...
متن کاملOn Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al
Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...
متن کاملReply to “ Reply to ‘ Comment on “ Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range –
The reply by Petron et al. [2012a] to my comment, Levi [2012], on their paper, Petron et al. [2012], defends their original conclusion: fugitive emissions in an area that they observed in 2008 were likely larger those indicated by previous estimates. The reply also claims to have now better characterized the uncertainties in their and my approaches. In particular, they question the representati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Current Biology
دوره 24 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014